Unconstitutional
Search
The
Fourth Amendment of the Constitution protects persons against “unreasonable
searches and seizures.” If a police officer has lawfully stopped (i.e.
seized) a person and then conducts a search, the issue become whether the
search was reasonable in relation to the stop. Specifically, courts must
consider whether the search as conducted was reasonable in scope or consent was
freely and voluntarily given for the search. State v. Spagnola,
289 P.3d 68, 73 (Kan. 2012).
In
June of 2007, Officer Jones lawfully stopped Shuan Spagnola when he failed to
stop for a stop sign. Id. at 70. When pulling his vehicle
over, Spagnola drove the car “onto the curb and into a grassy area next to the
curb and then back off of the curb before coming to a complete stop.” Id.
Additionally, before approaching Spagnola Jones witnessed him reach down
towards the car console – “suggesting the presence of a weapon and danger to
law enforcement.” Id. at 70, 73. Jones then asked Spagnola
to exit the vehicle and for his consent to search his pockets, which Spagnola
gave. Id. at 71. Jones found baggies in zipped pocket that
contained methamphetamine. Id.
The
Kansas Supreme Court found that Jones had legitimately stopped Spagnola when he
violated the law by not stopping at the stop sign. Id. at
73. Moreover, the court found that Jones reasonably prolonged the stop
because he had reason to believe Spagnola was impaired and had a weapon. Id.
However,
the court found that Jones’s thorough search of Spagnola’s pockets was
unreasonable and a thus a violation of Fourth Amendment protections because a
warrantless search for weapons on a person must be limited to a pat-down of the
outer clothing. Id. at 74.
Furthermore,
in regards to consent, the court held that Spagnola could not have possibly
given free and voluntary consent for the search of his pockets – as is required
– because “standing with his back to the offices, with his hands behind his
back and his fingers interlaced… was not a posture or an environment in which
it can be said that consent was voluntarily given free from coercion.” Id.
at 76.
If
you any questions regarding a search resulting from a traffic stop, contact
Lindsey Erickson or Dionne Scherff, LLC at www.ericksonscherff.com for counsel.
For More Information Please Contact:
Erickson Scherff, LLC
Attorneys at law
10990 Quivira Suite 200
Overland Park, KS 66210
Tel (913) 948-9490
Fax (913) 491-6398
Don't Forget To Visit Our Website:
www.ericksonscherff.com
Erickson Scherff, LLC
Attorneys at law
10990 Quivira Suite 200
Overland Park, KS 66210
Tel (913) 948-9490
Fax (913) 491-6398
Don't Forget To Visit Our Website:
www.ericksonscherff.com
No comments:
Post a Comment